Newsom government should veto SB 24, demand moratorium on abortion

0


In summary

Jaime Soto and Jessica Manzo, Roman Catholic Diocese of Sacramento: Women deserve safer, more respectful environments on campuses, not more ways for universities to hide their victimization. Senate Bill 24 is not about care health. This is an example of a partisan posture, consolidating the state’s aversion to any restriction on abortion.

Could you please complete this 3 minute survey on our service? Your feedback will help us make CalMatters better.




By Jaime Soto and Jessica Manzo, Special for CalMatters

Jaime Soto is Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Sacramento, [email protected] Jessica Manzo is a student at Sacramento State University and vice president of the Sac State Newman Center, [email protected] They wrote this review for CalMatters.

Senate Bill 24 would require California public universities to provide the chemical method of abortion to students. It would be an unnecessary expansion of the practice of abortion, and Gov. Gavin Newsom should veto it.

This measure would not be a wise investment. The Department of Finance points this out in its statement of opposition, citing the embezzlement of funds from other more attractive investments and the lack of expertise in the systems at the University of California and California State University to administer the program.

These caveats must be heeded, but there are other reasons to veto this bill.

The legislation would make university administrations even more complicit in the violent exploitation of university women highlighted by the “Me-Too” movement.

The measure, proposed to provide a response to unplanned pregnancies, offers no reporting mechanism in cases where women have been raped on campus.

The silence of SB 24, written by Senator Connie Leyva, a Chinese Democrat, on this point speaks loud and clear of the institutional indifference for women and children. Women deserve safer, more respectful environments on campus, no more ways for universities to hide their victimization.

Senate Bill 24 is not about health care. It is an example of a partisan posture, consolidating aversion to any restriction of abortion.

The promoters of this ideological measure have argued that it is necessary without any definitive data. California chooses not to keep statistics on the use of abortion, and this bill would extend that policy.

Other vital public health statistics, including euthanasia, are recorded and documented in more depth. This lack of information means that the legislator is acting in the dark, led by those who want to hide the consequences of abortion on women.

Six months ago, Governor Newsom took a courageous stand by instituting a moratorium on state use of the death penalty, citing statistics showing that the state sanctioned practice was “unequally and unfairly enforced. people of color, people with intellectual disabilities and people who cannot afford expensive legal representation. ”

Many of us support the governor’s action because of the moral imperative we all share to respect the dignity of human life.

The use of the death penalty is no longer necessary and constitutes an obstacle to the social promotion of the dignity of the human person.

Those of us who adhere to this moral principle say there is greater moral clarity regarding the practice of state-sanctioned abortions inflicted on many of the same populations cited by the governor, as well as others. vulnerable groups.

In the case of abortions, the unborn fetuses in their mother’s womb are clearly innocent. They are needlessly condemned for lack of moral vision and will. At its root, the practice of abortion is a “human error” which is “irreversible and irreparable”.

The Newsom government should consider a moratorium on the use of abortion because it is “applied unequally and unfairly” to people of color and poor people, and used for the selective abortion of girls and people with disabilities.

It should start by vetoing SB 24 and calling for more in-depth documentation and informed dialogue on how best to serve young women and unborn children.

Jaime Soto is Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Sacramento, [email protected] Jessica Manzo is a student at Sacramento State University and vice president of the Sac State Newman Center, [email protected] They wrote this review for CalMatters.



Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.